Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc., 916 S.W.2d 845 (1996)

Citation
Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc., 916 S.W.2d 845 (1996)
Parent Document
Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc., 916 S.W.2d 845 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1996-02-01

Other Sections in This Document (115)

Full Text

638 chars
883 S.W.2d 910, 930-31 (Mo.App.1994). Laurie Amador’s responses stating that the defective seat was responsible for her injuries were at least a mix of legal conclusions and facts, and at most, were legal conclusions. In either event, no attempt was made by defendant to redact the legal from the factual therein, probably because the remaining facts would have been largely irrelevant in the context that would have resulted. It was at the discretion of the trial judge whether or not to allow collateral matters into the trial. The admission of evidence lies within the broad discretion of the trial court. Harashe v. The Flintkote Co.,