Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Citation
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-02-07
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
Full Text
386 charsThere is no dispute that there was a written lease between the parties and that defendant had not paid in full the rent provided in that lease. That establishes a prima facie ease for recovery by plaintiff. Defendant contends that the parties orally agreed to a reduction of rent. Plaintiff contends that any oral modification is unenforceable because it violates the Statute of Frauds.