Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Citation
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-02-07
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
- Sec. 432
Full Text
715 charsThe parties entered into negotiations for a reduced rate. From October 1992 through September 1993, plaintiff billed defendant $5000 less than the amount due under the lease and defendant paid this lower amount. Plaintiffs evidence was that this lesser amount was a rent deferral to be paid later in the lease term. Defendant’s evidence was that an agreement was reached that defendant would execute a note for past due rent to be paid later in the lease term and that for a two year period from the fall of 1992 through September 1994 defendant would pay $5000 less than the amount provided in the lease and that reduction would not have to be repaid. No written amendment of the lease was executed by the parties.