Section 512

Citation: Section 512
Parent Document: K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2009-06-23
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1652656/ko-real-estate-llc-v-otoole/ ↗

Full Text

870 chars

Here, we confront a substantially different situation. Both K.O. and Defendant filed motions to amend the judgment within days after the first judgment was entered, and prior to the entry of the September 12, 2008 Final Order and Judgment. Defendant himself raised the issue of whether K.O. was deemed the owner of the Subject Property as opposed to the agent for the property owner, and the trial court deemed it proper to amend the judgment to clarify that K.O. acted in its capacity as agent for the owner of the Subject Property. The judgments may be read together without difficulty. Thus, having the authority under Rule 75.01 to amend the original judgment within the thirty-day time period, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it entered the September 12, 2008 Final Order and Judgment. Point V is denied. Point VI — Alleged Amount of Pash-Due Rent

Other Sections in This Document (119)

Full Text