Section 512
- Citation
- Section 512
- Parent Document
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2009-06-23
Other Sections in This Document (119)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
Full Text
790 charsa case pending in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, was initially assigned to Division 27, presided over by an associate circuit judge. The matter was subsequently transferred for a jury trial to Division 29, also presided over by an associate circuit judge. Local Rule 6.3 of the Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit provided that if any party to a contest pending in Division 27 requests a jury trial, the case is assigned to Division 29 and tried on the record under circuit court rules. Thus, this Court found that “because judgment in this case was rendered by an associate circuit court judge who had been assigned to hear the case under the procedures applicable before circuit court judges, under [SJection 512.180.1, [the appellant] had the right to appeal to this Court.” Id.