K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)

Citation: K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
Parent Document: K.O. Real Estate, LLC v. O'Toole, 291 S.W.3d 780 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2009-06-23
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1652656/ko-real-estate-llc-v-otoole/ ↗

Full Text

656 chars

Following the presentation of all of KO.’s evidence, K.O. moved for judgment in its favor. Defendant also moved for a directed verdict in its favor on the grounds that K.O. was not the owner of the Subject Property, and the lease was binding only on the owner. K.O. argued that it was the lawful lessor and landlord under the lease, and that it executed the lease as a manager on behalf of the owner who had retained K.O. to manage the property. The trial court denied both motions. Defendant again moved for directed verdict in its favor on the grounds that K.O. failed to specify exactly the amount of rent due. The trial court denied Defendant’s motion.

Other Sections in This Document (119)

Full Text