Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)

Citation
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Parent Document
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2016-12-27

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Full Text

623 chars
Weathers appeals from the trial court’s April 28, 2016, Order denying his motion to
intervene Similar to M and O_rf`, the trial court’s written order was not denominated a
“judgment” and the order did not contain the word “judgment." As in §_L_.[ and _Q_r;f, we
acknowledge that the corresponding docket entry stated, “SEE ORDER AND JUDGMENT.”
We further note that the docket entry included the trial judge’s typewritten name However, the
judge’s typewritten name is not a signature for the purposes of Rule 74.0l(a). § Rule 41 .08(a)
(“Documents requiring a judgc’s or commissioner’s signature may be signed by an original