Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)

Citation
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Parent Document
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2016-12-27

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Full Text

527 chars
In U, this Court followed and applied our reasoning in M on nearly identical facts.
Orfv. Orf, 208 S.W.3d 306, 307 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006). The trial court issued an order that was
not denominated a “judgment.” Ld. The corresponding docket entry stated, “Judgment Entered,”
but it was not signed or initialed by the judge. § After reviewing our analysis in _S_“[HJ,_J_, we held
that “this case involves an order that is not properly denominated, and an unsigned docket entry,
and we lackjurisdiction to consider the appeal.” igl_.