Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)

Citation
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Parent Document
Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2016-12-27

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Full Text

690 chars
In a subsequent written order, the trial court denied Weathers’s motion to intervene The
trial court reasoned that Amoso and Milton’s Stipuiation of Dismissal was a voluntary dismissal
under Rule 67.02(a), which was effective_-withoutjudicial approval_on the date it was filed.
Thus, the trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction and denied Weathers’s motion to intervene
The written order did not contain the word “judgment,” but the corresponding docket entry
stated, “SEE ORDER AND JUDGMENT-THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT BRYCE
WEATHERS [s:'c] MOTION TO INTERVENE IS HEREBY DENIED. SO ORDERED:
JUDGE PAULA P. BRYANT.” The trial judge’s name was typewritten Weathers appeals Discussion