Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Citation
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-04-08
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5241179/leve-v-delph/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
Full Text
449 charsDefendants here were month-to-month tenants under a lease when the plaintiffs, as landlords, terminated plaintiffs’ tenancy effective October 1, 1983. The defendants remained in possession of the premises after October 1, 1983, at which time they became holdover tenants, and thus no demand for possession was required prior to the institution of the unlawful detainer action. Southside National Bank, etc., supra. Defendants’ first point is denied.