Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Citation
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-04-08
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5241179/leve-v-delph/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
- Leve v. Delph, 710 S.W.2d 389 (1986)
Full Text
472 charsIn issue is whether the plaintiffs properly terminated defendants’ lease prior to the filing of the unlawful detainer action. Defendants claim that the incorrect termination date appearing on the first two of the three notices attempting to terminate defendants’ tenancy rendered the notices fatally defective. In addition, defendants contend that service of the notice by posting was improper, and plaintiffs did not have the right to possession of the mobile home space.