Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Citation
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-07-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
Full Text
468 charsOther documents received into evidence establish, as the jury could determine, that the agreement between the parties included reimbursement to appellant for mileage, expenses, and travel time (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2). Respondent Marion W. Clark, in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3, acknowledged that installation cost included travel, shipping, expenses and labor, and in another letter, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 9, remarked that “the mileage seems a bit high” as included in a bill.