Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Citation
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-07-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
Full Text
470 charsPRITCHARD, Judge. Upon an action upon an account, appellant sued respondent for labor and materials required to install a water system, having previously billed respondent for $53,-892.84, crediting $35,863.47, and claiming a balance due of $18,029.07. The jury returned a verdict for exactly the latter amount, the case having been submitted to it under MAI 26.03 (form for action on account) thus: “INSTRUCTION NO. 7 “Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: