Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Citation
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Parent Document
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1982-07-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. Nehai Tonkayea Lake Ass'n, 639 S.W.2d 177 (1982)
Full Text
642 charsPER CURIAM: In its motion for rehearing or transfer to the Supreme Court, respondent is correct in stating that the foregoing opinion is incorrect in the statement that the jury did not return a verdict including amounts of hotel bills and meals for employees, and mileage charges on vehicles. An examination of the itemization of appellant’s account rendered to respondent shows that these items were included therein, and the jury returned a verdict for exactly the total of the account, $18,029.07, the same amount prayed for in the petition to which the itemized account was attached. The account was received into evidence as an exhibit.