City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- Citation
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- Parent Document
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1975-10-14
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
- City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
Full Text
516 charsIn sum, the receivers were placed in an untenable position for it was impossible financially to carry out the order to rehabilitate the property. Receiver Cleary’s efforts to collect rents, let the property and obtain necessary financing were reasonable and proper under the circumstances. By December, 1971, the building was an unin-surable derelict, of minimal value and not economically salvageable. The fire and the alleged diminution of value was not the result of any negligence or misconduct of the receivers.