Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)

Citation
City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
Parent Document
City of St. Louis v. Goldenberg, 529 S.W.2d 33 (1975)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1975-10-14

Full Text

619 chars
In this court-tried equitable proceeding we “. . . review the case de novo upon both the law and the evidence, giving deference to the opportunity afforded the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses, and not disturb the judgment unless clearly erroneous.” Borgmann v. Florissant Development Co., 515 S.W.2d 189, 191[1] (Mo.App.1974); Blumenberg v. Minton, 507 S.W.2d 26, 27[3] (Mo.App.1974). “Clearly erroneous” in this context means “incorrect.” Grossman Wrecking Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp., 518 S.W.2d 719, 724[1] (Mo.App.1974); Mission Insurance Co. v. Ward, 487 S.W.2d 449, 452 (Mo. banc 1972).