Section 1105
- Citation
- Section 1105
- Parent Document
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-02-05
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Mobil Oil Credit Corp. v. DST Realty, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 658 (1985)
- Section 308
- Section 402
- Section 403
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
- Section 1105
Full Text
713 charsSuch a position is obviously unfair because it would give plaintiff a better, fully reconstructed building than the lease, the life of which improvements would extend far beyond the defendant’s remaining term of less than eight years. It would become far superior to its condition at the date of the lease. By the express terms of the agreement, defendant’s obligation was only to keep it in its lease-date condition. It had taken over 30 years for the building to reach its present dilapidated state. Patching was no longer feasible for major items; reasonable wear and tear had taken its toll. The leasehold is worthless if the lessee cannot occupy the premises. See, Restatement, supra, Section 12.2 comment e.