Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Citation
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-10-15
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
Full Text
292 charsDefendant’s arguments for remittitur or new trial are basically the same: (1) this instruction reflects Missouri law; (2) Defendant offered “undisputed” evidence that $6,480 was the cost to repair; (3) thus, the jury could award no more than $6,480 under the instruction and the law. Analysis