Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Citation
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-10-15
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
Full Text
487 charsPlaintiffs sued, trying them case on a theory of breach of implied warranty of habitability. They offered no “cost of repair” evidence, taking the position that the problem’s cause remained unknown and further intrusions could not be prevented. Testifying without objection that the house had no value, Plaintiffs asked for a verdict of $279,000, being the purchase price plus their cost of improvements. In contrast, Defendant’s expert opined that the problem could be fixed for $6,480.