Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Citation
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-10-15
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
- Davies v. Estate of Broege, 410 S.W.3d 303 (2013)
Full Text
346 charsThe jury awarded Plaintiffs $255,594. Defendant moved for a new trial or remit-titur to $6,480 to conform to Defendant’s evidence of cost to repair. The trial court denied these motions, finding that the verdict was “consistent with the jury not being persuaded by Defendant’s evidence while being persuaded by the evidence offered by Plaintiff.”