Section 534
- Citation
- Section 534
- Parent Document
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2007-02-20
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1404073/moser-v-cline/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
Full Text
400 charsIn their second point on appeal, the Mosers claim that the trial court erred in allowing the Clines’ counterclaim of breach of implied warranty of habitability in their unlawful detainer action because affirmative defenses and counterclaims are prohibited in such actions. As discussed in point one above, the Mosers are correct that counterclaims are prohibited in unlawful detainer actions. Walker,