Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Citation
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Parent Document
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2007-02-20
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1404073/moser-v-cline/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Moser v. Cline, 214 S.W.3d 390 (2007)
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
- Section 534
Full Text
620 charsRichard and Twyla Moser appeal the judgment of the trial court in their action for unlawful detainer against Steven and Vickie Cline. They claim that the trial court erred in (1) failing to award double-rent damages for the period of the Clines’ unlawful detainer under section 534.330, RSMo 2000, (2) allowing the Clines’ counterclaim of breach of implied warranty of habitability in their unlawful detainer action, (3) finding for the Clines’ on the counterclaim of breach of implied warranty of habitability, and (4) awarding money damages to the Clines for breach of implied warranty of habitability. 1 The judg *392