§ 42-1903

Citation: § 42-1903
Parent Document: Rayner v. Yale Steam Laundry Condo. Ass'n. (2023)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2023-02-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9375972/rayner-v-yale-steam-laundry-condo-assn/ ↗

Full Text

726 chars

58
        See Moradi v. Protas, Kay, Spivok & Protas, Chartered, 494 A.2d 1329,
1332 (D.C. 1985) (“The decision to grant or deny [a Rule 60(b)] motion lies within
the sound discretion of the court.”).
      59
         See Reshard v. Stevenson, 270 A.3d 274, 283 (D.C. 2022) (“[W]e could
perhaps sustain the trial court’s determination that [appellant] has not shown
‘mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,’ . . . notwithstanding the
trial court’s failure to consider all of the Starling factors, if [appellant] did not
present an adequate defense.” (quoting Super. Ct. Civ. R. 60(b)(1)).
      60
           Brown v. Kone, Inc., 841 A.2d 331, 334-35 (D.C. 2004).
                                          31

Other Sections in This Document (401)

Full Text