Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-1903

Citation
§ 42-1903
Parent Document
Rayner v. Yale Steam Laundry Condo. Ass'n. (2023)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2023-02-16

Other Sections in This Document (401)

Full Text

683 chars
50
           See 1/21/21 Order at 12.
      51
           Sibley, 134 A.3d at 797.
      52
         Rayner’s brief to this court also included several proposed “Counts” and
claims that he did not raise before the trial court. We do not analyze these new
claims because “[q]uestions not properly raised and preserved during the
proceedings under examination, and points not asserted with sufficient precision to
indicate distinctly the party’s thesis, will normally be spurned on appeal.”
Comford v. United States, 947 A.2d 1181, 1186 (D.C. 2008) (alteration in original)
(quoting Miller v. Avirom, 384 F.2d 319, 321-22 (D.C. Cir. 1967)).
                                        28