DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-1903

Citation
§ 42-1903
Parent Document
Rayner v. Yale Steam Laundry Condo. Ass'n. (2023)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2023-02-16
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9375972/rayner-v-yale-steam-laundry-condo-assn/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (401)

Full Text

652 chars 
53
          See Super. Ct. Civ. R. 60(b)(2) (“[T]he court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for . . . newly
discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been
discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b) . . . .”); id. 60(b)(1)
(“[T]he court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment,
order, or proceeding for . . . mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable
neglect . . . .”); see also Chatman v. Lawlor, 831 A.2d 395, 404 (D.C. 2003)
(“[A]rguments under each component of Rule 60(b) are separate and not
interchangeable.”).