Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Citation
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Parent Document
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 1947-11-12
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
Full Text
476 charsAlthough plaintiff contends he was a tenant and entitled to a thirty day notice, it is observed that the trial court did not rule either that plaintiff was a tenant or was entitled to a thirty day notice. The court ruled that plaintiff was entitled to a reasonable notice. Is a roomer entitled to notice before he can be put out for nonpayment of rent? Our attention has been called to no authority for so holding. The few authorities we have found indicate to the contrary.11