Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Citation
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Parent Document
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 1947-11-12
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
- Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513 (1947)
Full Text
457 charsDefendants base their appeal on the following contention: “No notice to quit is necessary nor is the institution of court proceedings necessary where there is no existing relationship of landlord and tenant and the roomer is delinquent in the payment of his room rent.” Plaintiff contends that by reason of the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act1 he had the status of a tenant at sufferance and consequently was entitled to a thirty day notice to quit.