Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Citation
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Parent Document
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2001-04-26
Other Sections in This Document (57)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
- Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
Full Text
700 chars. In this jurisdiction, the factors considered in determining whether an occupant has exclusive possession include: (1) whether the owner provided furnishings, linens, towels, and daily maid service to the occupant; (2) the owner’s right to access the room; (3) the number of rooms provided; (4) the scheduled interval for payment (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly); (5) the substance of the contract between the owner and the occupant; and (6) any other conditions of occupancy. See, e.g., Anderson v. William J. Davis, Inc., 553 A.2d 648, 649 (D.C. 1989); Tamamian v. Gabbard, supra note 2, 55 A.2d at 514-15. 5 . At least one Superior Court decision has extended Mendes to roomers. See Sanuel v. King,