Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)

Citation
Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
Parent Document
Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2001-04-26

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

591 chars
should be extended to include him. However, it is also true that the only document executed between the parties was the registration card completed upon appellant’s initial arrival. We note that, appellant was obliged, on a weekly basis, to pay for his furnished room and to make the room accessible for linen and cleaning service. In the context of our present eviction statute, our existing judicial decisions on the subject, and relevant treatises, we decline appellant’s invitation to extend the Mendes holding to this case, nor are we empowered to overrule Davis, supra, 140 A.2d 188. 6