Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)

Citation
Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
Parent Document
Harkins v. Win Corp., 771 A.2d 1025 (2001)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2001-04-26

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

377 chars
.Harkins also asserted a claim for conversion for the personal property left in his room, which the trial court also dismissed upon WIN Corp.’s motion for summary judgment. That ruling is not challenged on appeal. 2 . See Tamamian v. Gabbard, 55 A.2d 513, 514-15 (D.C.1947); Beall v. Everson, 34 A.2d 41, 41-42 (D.C.1943). 3 . D.C.Code §§ 45-2501 to -2594 (1996 & Supp.2000). 4