Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005)

Citation
Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005) 2.
Parent Document
Miller v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 870 A.2d 556 (2005)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2005-03-24

Other Sections in This Document (33)

Full Text

643 chars
2. Mr. Miller has asked the court to reinstitute a fine against Borger which the RHC has set aside. The fine would go to the public coffers, not to Mr. Miller. The question that naturally comes to mind in this situation is whether Mr. Miller has suffered “injury in fact” sufficient to give him standing to challenge the RHC’s action. This issue is complicated by the reality that, so far as I can discern, nobody other than Mr. Miller would have standing to complain. This would present an interesting question for a law school examination, but we need not reach it here because the RHC has not challenged Mr. Miller’s standing in this court.