Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bridges v. Clark, 59 A.3d 978 (2013)

Citation
Bridges v. Clark, 59 A.3d 978 (2013)
Parent Document
Bridges v. Clark, 59 A.3d 978 (2013)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2013-01-24

Other Sections in This Document (47)

Full Text

289 chars
At trial, Mr. Clark testified that he had “[njever found a leak in the roof.” In response, Ms. Bridges sought to have the Love affidavit admitted into evidence. The trial court ruled, however, that Ms. Bridges could not use the Love affidavit, on the ground that the affidavit was hearsay.