Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Pack v. Feuchtenberger, 22 S.W.2d 914 (1929)

Citation
Pack v. Feuchtenberger, 22 S.W.2d 914 (1929)
Parent Document
Pack v. Feuchtenberger, 22 S.W.2d 914 (1929)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1929-06-14

Full Text

517 chars
day, which, as said before, was June 7, 1907but this question was not before the court, and even the dictum does not say that the landlord could remove the tenant then, except by inference. The headnote quoted from Davis v. Hall, 6 Ky. Law Rep. 444, is from a superior court case. The opinion is not printed, but, reading all the headnotes, it is obvious that the Hall case is exactly like the Caulfield case, and that the quoted headnote is but dictum, and no authority contrary to the rule herein-before elaborated.