DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)

Citation
Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)
Parent Document
Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2008-09-15
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2622045/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (72)

Full Text

382 chars 
¶ 13 The tenants assert that the trial court erred in ruling on summary judgment that the conversion clause in Attachment B does not violate the MHLTA or the CPA. The tenants also assert that the trial court erred in enforcing the rent adjustment provision in Attachment A because the terms materially altered the terms of the offer LME made to the tenants in its advertisements.[6]