Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)

Citation: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)
Parent Document: Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Lme, 192 P.3d 378 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2008-09-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2622045/little-mountain-estates-tenants... ↗

Full Text

732 chars

¶ 12 Following trial, the court entered extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court concluded that even though LME violated the MHLTA by allowing tenants to move in without first signing a lease agreement, the tenants were bound by the terms of the 25-year lease that they voluntarily entered into after moving into LME. But because the court concluded that the CPI rent formula in Attachment A did not make sense and was ambiguous, the court modified the formula. Otherwise, the court ruled that the lease was enforceable. In the conclusions of law, the court reiterated its previous ruling that the assignment conversion clause in Attachment B did not violate the MHLTA or the CPA.[5] The tenants appeal. ANALYSIS

Other Sections in This Document (72)

Full Text