Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)

Citation
Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)
Parent Document
Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2002-05-06

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

772 chars
[25] Heaverlo, 80 Wash.App. at 731, 911 P.2d 406. See also Income Prop. Inv. Corp. v. Trefethen, 155 Wash. 493, 284 P. 782 (1930) (equitable defenses available in unlawful detainer actions); Andersonian Inv. Co. v. Wade, 108 Wash. 373, 184 P. 327 (1919) (rule prohibiting defenses too broad; tenant may defend by setting up any defense, legal or equitable, which will excuse his breach); Brown v. Baruch, 24 Wash. 572, 64 P. 789 (1901) (equitable estoppel defense permitted); Himpel v. Lindgren, 159 Wash. 20, 291 P. 1085 (1930) (tenants may raise affirmative equitable defenses); Watkins v. Batch, 41 Wash. 310, 83 P. 321 (1906) (same—part performance of an oral contract); Northcraft v. Blumauer, 53 Wash. 243, 101 P. 871 (1909) (same—part performance of an oral lease).