Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)

Citation
Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)
Parent Document
Josephinium Associates v. Kahli, 45 P.3d 627 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2002-05-06

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

496 chars
We may review a moot case if it contains "`matters of continuing and substantial public interest.'"[5] In deciding whether review is appropriate, we consider: "`(1) the public or private nature of the question presented; (2) the desirability of an authoritative determination which will provide future guidance to public officers; and (3) the likelihood that the question will recur.' "[6] A further consideration is "`whether there is genuine adverseness and quality advocacy on the issues.'"[7]