State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Citation: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Parent Document: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2009-02-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4946203/state-v-drake/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (28)

State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Full Text

209 chars

*96¶21 Because insufficient evidence supported the court’s verdict, the proper remedy is to reverse and remand for dismissal with prejudice. State v. Hickman, 135 Wn.2d 97, 103, 954 P.2d 900 (1998). CONCLUSION