Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Citation
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Parent Document
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2009-02-26

Full Text

595 chars
¶16 The trial court concluded that Mr. Drake’s intention to return is immaterial. Legal authority shows otherwise. A residence “is the place where a person lives as either a temporary or permanent dwelling, a place to which one intends to return, as distinguished from a place of temporary sojourn or transient visit.” State v. Pickett, 95 Wn. App. 475, 478, 975 P.2d 584 (1999). If Mr. Drake maintained his residence at the New Washington Apartments and intended to return there, he was under no duty to change his *95registration to another residence or declare that he had no fixed residence.