State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Citation: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Parent Document: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2009-02-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4946203/state-v-drake/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (28)

State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Full Text

251 chars

*91¶1 David J. Drake challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. We agree that the evidence is insufficient and reverse and remand for dismissal with prejudice. Schultheis, C.J.
FACTS