INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Wadsworth, 169 Wash. App. 412 (2012)

Citation
Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Wadsworth, 169 Wash. App. 412 (2012)
Parent Document
Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Wadsworth, 169 Wash. App. 412 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2012-07-09
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4951771/indigo-real-estate-services-inc... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (53)

Full Text

495 chars 
¶32 Moreover, when Congress passed this statute, it could not have known how the 50 states might define the terms and procedures of their various landlord/tenant laws. Instead, Congress was entitled to expect that the word “termination” would be given its common meaning. Because the “termination” of a tenancy, as it is commonly understood, is not limited to a landlord’s unilateral decision to not renew a lease or extend a month-to-month tenancy, Indigo’s present contention is without merit.