Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)

Citation
Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)
Parent Document
Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
1996-10-28

Other Sections in This Document (75)

Full Text

1,126 chars
We reverse the trial court’s refusal to award Sprincin double damages. We affirm its refusal to entertain Sound’s counterclaim. We remand for computation of rent and double damages in accordance with our opinion. We also instruct the trial court to include an award for reasonable appellate attorney fees when entering final judgment. Coleman and Cox, JJ., concur. 1 See RCW 59.12.170. . 2 Codd v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 14 Wn.2d 600, 605, 128 P.2d 968, 151 A.L.R. 316 (1942). 3 Big Bend Land Co. v. Huston, 98 Wash. 640, 646, 168 P. 470 (1917); Little v. Catania, 48 Wn.2d 890, 893, 297 P.2d 255 (1956). 4 See, e.g., Kelly v. Schorzman, 3 Wn. App. 908, 913, 478 P.2d 769 (1970). 5 Codd, 14 Wn.2d at 605. 6 Sowers v. Lewis, 49 Wn.2d 891, 894, 307 P.2d 1064 (1957); Markland v. Wheeldon, 29 Wn. App. 517, 522, 629 P.2d 921, review denied, 96 Wn.2d 1018 (1981); Spokane Merchants’ Ass’n v. Acord, 99 Wash. 674, 676, 170 P. 329, 6 A.L.R. 835 (1918). 7 Callison, 44 Wash. 202, 87 P. 120 (1906). 8 3 Ball. Code, § 1751, Laws 1901, cited in Callison, 44 Wash, at 204. 9 44 Wash, at 205. 10 See Spokane Merchants’ Ass’n v. Acord,