Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)

Citation
Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)
Parent Document
Sprincin King Street Partners v. Sound Conditioning Club, Inc., 925 P.2d 217 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
1996-10-28

Other Sections in This Document (75)

Full Text

251 chars
the court approved a doubling of past due rent without discussion; the parties obviously did not raise the issue. Similarly, the court approved double rent in Decker v. Verloop, 23 but without analysis, and by relying solely on Hinckley v. Casey. 24 ,