Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)

Citation
Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
Parent Document
Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2003-02-11

Full Text

563 chars
The notice requirement set forth in comment (c) has been followed by the courts in other jurisdictions. See Payne v. Candelora, 45 Conn. Supp. 191, 194, 706 A.2d 22, 23 (1997); Spence v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 195 Ga. App. 294, 295-96, 393 S.E.2d 1, 2 (1990). In Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson, 335 Md. 661, 671-72, 645 A.2d 1147, 1152 (1994), the court, finding a private cause of action under Restatement (Second) of Property § 17.6, required a showing that the landlord knew, or had reason to know, of the problem and had the opportunity to correct it.