Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Citation
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-02-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4934783/lian-v-stalick/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (31)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
Full Text
476 charsA landlord is subject to liability for physical harm caused to the tenant and others upon the leased property with the consent of the tenant or his subtenant by a dangerous condition existing before or arising after the tenant has taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of: (1) an implied warranty of habitability; or (2) a duty created by statute or administrative regulation.