Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Citation
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-02-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4934783/lian-v-stalick/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (31)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)
Full Text
414 charsHence, to prevail on a section 17.6 claim, the tenant must show: (1) that the condition was dangerous, (2) that the landlord was aware of the condition or had a reasonable opportunity to discover the condition and failed to exercise ordinary care to repair the condition, and (3) that the existence of the condition was a violation of an implied warranty of habitability or a duty created by statute or regulation.