Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Citation
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-12-10
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
Full Text
511 charsWe hold that the separate water and sewer charges were substantial modifications of Sargent, Barrett, and Nisbit’s rental agreements under Minn.Stat. § 327C.02 and were therefore unenforceable as a matter of law. The district court appropriately granted Sargent, Barrett, and Nisbit partial summary judgment. We further hold that the district court properly enjoined Bethel from continuing to charge the illegal utility fees. See Hvamstad v. City of Rochester, 276 N.W.2d 632, 632 (Minn.1979) (stating that *804