Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Citation
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-12-10
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
Full Text
510 charsWe are not persuaded by Bethel’s contention that treating the addition of utility charges as a rule modification rather than as a rent increase will lead to inconsistent results by preventing park owners from complying with all of section 327C’s provisions. A new or amended rule is unenforceable against a resident with an existing rental agreement unless the “rule is reasonable and is not a substantial modification of the original agreement.” Minn. Stat. § 327C.02, subd. 2. A “substantial modification” is