Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Citation
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-12-10
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc., 653 N.W.2d 800 (2002)
Full Text
468 charsAppellant Bethel Properties, Inc., a manufactured-home park owner, challenges the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment and injunctive relief to respondents Nancy Sargent, Colleen Barrett and Michelle Nisbit, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated (Sargent, Barrett, and Nisbit), residents in Bethel’s park. Bethel argues that the court’s ruling is based on an erroneous interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 327C (2002). We affirm. FACTS