Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)

Citation
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Parent Document
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2008-07-22

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

554 chars
But the district court also concluded that it had to allow BTI to defend the eviction action by presenting evidence that the agreement between the parties was for purchase, not lease, of the property. The district court plainly contemplated that BTI would be able to fully litigate its additional claims against Bjorklund in the shareholder action and did not address the possibility that, or the extent to which, BTI could be collaterally estopped by the eviction verdict from asserting those claims in the Wright County action. 4 See Burgmeier v. Bjur,